Timeline for Your answer up-voting policy
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2014 at 8:20 | comment | added | eldo | @m_goldberg I'm relatively new to Mathematica and SE. Hopefully, with growing experience, also objectivity will go up. Your second comment ("high rep members...") makes a very good point. | |
| Jul 31, 2014 at 1:08 | comment | added | m_goldberg | Also, consider this: if the very high rep members of the community adhered to your policy, they would almost never up-vote an answer. I have good reason to believe, however, that they up vote many answers for which they personally learn nothing new. | |
| Jul 31, 2014 at 1:07 | comment | added | m_goldberg | It seems you are saying that you do not up vote a question that has tutorial value for others but not you personally. I think such a policy is short-sighted because I strongly believe, when we are reading an answer, we should consider how it might have tutorial value for any Mathematica users, no matter what their skill level is. Up voting such answers will encourage more of them and help to build the library of good answers that Mathematica users can consult in the future. Building up that library is an important goal we should always have in mind. | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 18:56 | history | edited | eldo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| Jul 30, 2014 at 17:24 | comment | added | eldo | @MichaelE2 Thanks, nice feature :) | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 17:07 | comment | added | Michael E2 | Comments can be upvoted -- no rep accrues, though. See m_goldberg's comment to halirutan's answer. (2 upvotes right now.) | |
| Jul 30, 2014 at 16:26 | history | answered | eldo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |