I think the number one place where visitors to the MSE get peeved is with our usage of bugs
They find something that doesn't work and then quite reasonably attach bugs, but then we come in and say, "We prefer to only label those things as bugs which have been confirmed with WRI". Both sides of the coin are valid in my mind and I think we should stick with our community convention, but I wonder if it's worth creating suspected-bug or similar to handle cases where confirmation with WRI has not yet been obtained.
This may have been proposed before. I couldn't see it explicitly in the titles of any of the questions here. Worth bringing up again, at the minimum, though.
fixed-bug
status/tag lately. There is also a combination of documentation+bugs. Or what about bugs in 3rd part packages? So there are clearly couple of types/states of bugs we are interested in. How to handle all of that in a consistent way, without using 2 tags per question, or without worrying about a flood of misplaced tags. There are voices saying this is not a place for a bug tracker which I think I agree with, otoh I would love to have one here :P – Kuba♦ Mar 14 '18 at 21:34