The problem with the post you're referring to was not the responses you got, but the way your question was phrased and the rudeness in your comments to the responses and the later edits in your question. And, although most of your rude comments were deleted and are unrecoverable now, anyone can see your original question and the edits therein.
Let's start with the very first post, quoted here in full:
The product of Normal distributions is an un-normalized Gaussian distribution. I am trying to get MMa to give me the result in some coherent readable form:
(* Create a product of normalize gaussians *)
gau[y_, v_] := Exp[-(y^2)/(2*v)]/Sqrt[2*Pi*v];
f[z_] := Product[gau[z - m[i], B[i]], {i, 1, 3}];
(* Calculate the mean and var of the resulting gaussian *)
logf = f[x] // Log // PowerExpand;
mn = x /. Solve[D[logf, x] == 0, x][[1]];
vn = 1/(-D[logf, {x, 2}]);
h[z_] := gau[z - mn, vn]
This much works fine, and all that remains is the find f[x]/h[x], which is just a constant. And all kinds of things go wrong there. I've tried many combinations of Expand, Together, Simplify, FullSimplify, Log, Exp, and PowerExpand, but result is always a mess.
I even tried just calculating f[mn]/h[mn] to make it easier, but I still find that simplifying the exponents garbles up the constants and vice-versa.
As one can see there's not actually a question asked. You mention that his goal is to find f[x]/h[x] and that your approaches so far have failed.
Both user Wolfies (the statistician and Mathematica book/software author Dr. Colin Rose) and I interpreted this post in the same, I would say, understandable way, that is a request to find a simple expression for f[x]/h[x] and we provided an answer to that question.
We both noted that some of the phrasing of the original question ("product of distributions") was not strictly correct. In the case of Wolfies' answer you responded in a very offensive manner, similar to how you write about him in your comment above "I see one of the guys edited his first snotty answer".
In my case, you first uttered your surprise with what I had been doing, then claimed it was wrong in various ways. As far as I could see, you were incorrect in all of these protestations. The discussion (partly deleted I believe) started getting rather unpleasant, culminating in edit 8 of your post in which you added the following heading:
EDIT: This question has not been Answered. The two responses below are from users who did not understand the question.
Again, rather offensive. I believe most people who read your original question will conclude that the answers that were given perfectly addressed the question as (perhaps ambiguously) phrased. A similar offensive sentence can be found in the current Meta post:
I posted a Question this morning and promptly received responses from
two users who had not understood the Question at all.
All while this is going on you kept on receiving downvotes from users who saw what was happening (to be sure: I didn't downvote). That at least should have given you a hint that there might been something wrong with your post and/or comments. I must assume that some of your comments were flagged as rude or offensive too as they have been removed.
When I found out that you downvoted me (not too difficult to do) I simply decided to ignore you for the time being. Until I saw your post here.
By the way, you stated in one of your comments above "posting unresponsive responses and then arguing with me all morning". I may be mistaken, but I believe you're confusing me with another frequent user of this site, with whom you have had some unpleasant exchanges earlier.
