Skip to main content

Timeline for Policy on Homework questions

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 12, 2012 at 11:47 comment added rcollyer @celtschk prior to the edit, that was all there was. Lacking the extra commentary, there were several ways to interpret it, including as an indictment against Mathematica.
Jun 12, 2012 at 10:57 comment added celtschk @rcollyer: It's a letter written to Wolfram. It's not a letter talking about Mathematica. It's a letter from Feynman criticising Wolfram's attitude towards other people. I can't see how that relates in any way to Mathematica. I've heard that Newton was a terrible person, but that doesn't change that he was one of the greatest scientists ever, and it certainly doesn't invalidate his scientific achievements. So even without the clarification, I cannot see the slightest way how this post could be an indictment against Mathematica.
Jun 11, 2012 at 22:40 comment added rcollyer Thank you for the clarification, and as it is now in line with my own opinion, +1.
Jun 11, 2012 at 21:35 history edited newprint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 109 characters in body
Jun 11, 2012 at 21:27 history edited newprint CC BY-SA 3.0
added 586 characters in body
Jun 11, 2012 at 21:18 comment added rcollyer At this point, this reads like it is indictment against Mathematica itself, so I downvoted it.
Jun 11, 2012 at 21:11 comment added István Zachar I fail to see the relevance here. Could you please explain it? Is it the case that being a homework-nazi (i.e. eliminating HW questions) cause people to do more administrative than the productive work? This might be a valid argument, but without any policies of administration this site surely would be a worse place.
Jun 11, 2012 at 20:42 comment added Sjoerd C. de Vries Mod How precisely does the letter you cite relate to the homework question?
Jun 11, 2012 at 19:22 history answered newprint CC BY-SA 3.0